THE COURT OF APPEAL DECISION IN PERSERO II: ARE WE NOW CLEAR ABOUT THE STEPS TO ENFORCE A NON-FINAL DAB DECISION UNDER FIDIC? by FRÉDÉRIC GILLION

In the latest chapter of the Persero saga, the majority of the Singapore Court of Appeal concluded in a rare split judgment 2 (“the 2015 Court of Appeal decision”) that a binding but not final decision made by a dispute adjudication board (“DAB”) under a FIDIC form of contract could be immediately enforced by referring directly to arbitration the narrow dispute over the paying party’s failure to comply with the DAB decision.

The full article can be seen here: International-Construction-Law-Review-COURT_OF_APPEAL_DECISION_IN_PERSERO_II

Leave a Reply